Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: null and void
Uh. No. Privacy laws and laws passed in response to identity theft prevent just any old munchkin from seeing your records.

Just did a very quick (and very incomplete) search of the Massachusetts Dept of Vital Records website and it looks like you're incorrect.On the form through which you order a record by mail it asks for your name and mailing address but I see no requirement to state your "relationship" to the person whose record you're ordering.

I know that that *used* to be the case a few years back because I did it.I saw the official records of...and got copies of them....people to whom I had *no* legal or familial connection (don't ask why....it's a long story).

If you wish to and are able to...point me to the place where it says only certain "classes" of people can see a person's records.

103 posted on 11/07/2008 9:18:05 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Obama:"Ich bin ein beginner")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: Gay State Conservative

Thanks!

I know under California law I needed to sign a notarized affidavit to get a copy of mine a few months ago. IIRC, to get a BC I’d need to certify that it was me, a direct blood relative (parent or child), or that I shared a common ancestor with the person in question.

From everything I’ve heard Hawaii shares the same rules. I’m astonished that Massachusetts doesn’t.

It’s moot in any event, the Governor of Hawaii has ordered that they are to do everything in their power to keep a copy of 0bama’s BC out of the hands of the press.


110 posted on 11/07/2008 9:27:49 AM PST by null and void (This isn't an election, it's a manifestation of a Salvador Dali painting. [Persistence of Division])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson