Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TalBlack
There will be no ‘civilian’ security force. Period.

I agree with you.

But what is troubling is 0bama's call for it. What is his intention ?

Why do we need a "security force" ?

Does he not know the historical implications of that, and how it would be perceived by the majority of Americans ?

What troubles me about 0bama, is how alien his ideas are to what America is, how they do provide a scope into the interior landscape of who he is.

Watch the youtube linked in the article.

His demeanor is unsettling.

136 posted on 11/07/2008 10:14:41 AM PST by happygrl (BORG: Barack 0bama Resistance Group: we will not be assimilated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: happygrl
“But what is troubling is 0bama’s call for it. What is his intention ?

Why do we need a “security force” ?”

Power. Obama in particular and leftists in general despise freedom. Such a force could have only one function suppression and control. That is why Hitler et;al have ALWAYS used such things.

139 posted on 11/07/2008 4:51:15 PM PST by TalBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson