Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hoosiermama
“IMO The SCOTUS must hear the case or risk impeachment in mass.” Um, do you really believe Reid's democrap controlled Senate would try the case or that Pelosi’s controlled House would bring the case? Please, stick to reality, not to fantasies.
355 posted on 11/07/2008 11:02:20 AM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN
Guess the point that I was trying to make was that the SCOTUS is not going to ALL deny the oath of office they took and open themselves up to ridicule.Even if Berg doesn't prove his case, there still must be a system to verify eligibility.

The justices have achieved their position because of their knowledge and respect of the law. They are not en mass going to ignore this situation. (Particularly Souter) Guess I should have put some kind of sarcasm marks around that part.

361 posted on 11/07/2008 1:54:41 PM PST by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson