To: GovernmentShrinker
Palin has ZERO foreign policy experience, and it was solely out of politeness and party loyalty that Rice didnt point that out.
And what was Reagan's and Bush's foreign policy experience while governors
Bush and even Chaney were caught completely off guard by the muslim threat to this country--even after the World Trade Tower bombing under Clinton --the USS Cole--Kabul Towers etc etc
It was hardly even mentioned in the campaign in 2000 if at all
29 posted on
11/06/2008 1:16:29 PM PST by
uncbob
To: uncbob
Reagan was old enough to have experienced a lot more history than Palin, and his several years of military service during WWII, although entirely in the US due to his poor eyesight, included extensive work in production of army training films, which certainly wouldn’t have been focusing on domestic activities during wartime. In Bush’s case, he had a front row seat during his father’s Presidency, and extraordinary access to his father’s experience and hindsight re the first Iraq war. He also certainly had plenty of experience in social situations with foreign dignitaries.
To: uncbob
Bush and even Chaney were caught completely off guard by the muslim threat to this country--even after the World Trade Tower bombing under Clinton --the USS Cole--Kabul Towers etc etc It was hardly even mentioned in the campaign in 2000 if at all
Was the muslim threat to this country not mentioned because they didn't consider it a threat or because it would have been spun as 'racist'?
43 posted on
11/06/2008 3:34:42 PM PST by
magslinger
(If you take my gun from me, mind the barrel. It will be hot.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson