Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin vs. McCain: Palin Insider Names Names
Regular Folks United ^ | November 6, 2008 | Kerri Houston Toloczko

Posted on 11/06/2008 10:45:00 AM PST by mbraynard

News has been circulating around GOP insiders for weeks that McCain campaign honchos Rick Davis and Steve Schmidt were planning to blame Sarah Palin for McCain’s loss. This was expected to be an effort to punt the blame for their own failures to the side of the ticket that was most popular with the base, attracted the largest rally crowds, and scared the living bejeepers out of the opposing party.

(Excerpt) Read more at regularfolksunited.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 11thcommandment; 2008; blame; mccain; palin; rickdavis; rinopurge; steveschmidt; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 701-708 next last
To: publana

Thanks for the answer - I didn’t know that Newt was considering getting back in - he’s the smartest (and most honest) of all!!!

Sounds like we think pretty much the same! Sarah handled the abortion issue just fine - while she doesn’t believe in for herself, she thinks it should be up to the states to decide? If there was a way to gracefully include both views, then the rest of the conservative stuff would easily sell to most personally responsible people. That single issue turned away a large percentage of American voters. How can this be handled? I think it’s the key to coming together with conservative thinkers on all the other subjects. I would really like to get some insight into this issue to see if I can believe that the conservatives have a chance to take back this country.

Any words of wisdom would certainly be appreciated.
Thanks,
Gretchen


641 posted on 11/07/2008 12:32:25 PM PST by GretchenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 636 | View Replies]

To: sausageseller
Nicolle Wallace was a formidable foe of Goren on Law & Order Criminal Intent, ruthless serial killer.


642 posted on 11/07/2008 12:55:44 PM PST by itsahoot (We will have world government. Whether by conquest or consent. Looks like that question is answered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: nralife
That's a flat out lie! I heard Rush today.

True dat!

643 posted on 11/07/2008 12:59:49 PM PST by itsahoot (We will have world government. Whether by conquest or consent. Looks like that question is answered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: bw17
No matter how you spin it, McCain was a weak choice for president, and Palin was an even weaker choice for VP.

Being half right is not a virtue.

644 posted on 11/07/2008 1:04:41 PM PST by itsahoot (We will have world government. Whether by conquest or consent. Looks like that question is answered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: bw17
She was a weak VP candidate paired up with an even weaker Presidential candidate.

You are beginning to sound like an Obama talking point. Give it a rest. I would have done a write in, except for Palin. Many others did the same, get over it.

645 posted on 11/07/2008 1:17:47 PM PST by itsahoot (We will have world government. Whether by conquest or consent. Looks like that question is answered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: mbraynard
Am I wrong?

Yes.

646 posted on 11/07/2008 1:33:19 PM PST by itsahoot (We will have world government. Whether by conquest or consent. Looks like that question is answered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: Cedric
Unsourced rumors.
Started by Obama operatives.

Opinions are not facts, and should be labeled as such. Which is this?

647 posted on 11/07/2008 1:36:40 PM PST by itsahoot (We will have world government. Whether by conquest or consent. Looks like that question is answered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
Think before you speak.

No, only Harvard, or Yale grads can think, therefore anything we say is thoughtless.


648 posted on 11/07/2008 1:41:57 PM PST by itsahoot (We will have world government. Whether by conquest or consent. Looks like that question is answered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
Cedric, you can’t deny McCain hasn’t put a stop to these allegations made on Fox News last night by Carl Cameron.

Quotes, or links, please. Bet you can't post them, and I mean after the election quotes.

649 posted on 11/07/2008 1:43:27 PM PST by itsahoot (We will have world government. Whether by conquest or consent. Looks like that question is answered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

What do you mean? Do you want me to provide quotes from Carl Cameron or do you want Cedric to provide McCain quotes stating he stands by Palin?


650 posted on 11/07/2008 1:46:32 PM PST by ConservativeMind (Concerning Larry Sinclair: It is strange when you can be thankful for having a pervert on your side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies]

To: lainie

He really is a weasel; today he and Cindy issued some sort of statement, but in the statement they did not try to refute the smears against Palin... He really does defend his male democratic colleagues more than his female running mate who tried mightily to get his sorry rear elected.


651 posted on 11/07/2008 1:47:05 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mbraynard

So there were traitors in the McCain camp after all...


652 posted on 11/07/2008 1:48:21 PM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

Carl Cameron lost any respect he had by reporting the b.s. without identifying the names of the sources. That nutcase O’Reilly was absolutely gleeful. Its obvious he wants to get Palin on his hour to brow beat her. He needs to get those including Cameron who are elevating b.s. on the stand and grill them. He won’t.


653 posted on 11/07/2008 2:17:59 PM PST by hgro (Jerry Riversd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn

“Country First” should have read “McCain First” - I never did trust him and was only going to vote against Obama before Sarah came along. I probably wasn’t the only one who fell out of their chair when he said “the economy is strong” and then made a total a.. of himself by rushing back to Washington and then voting for a socialist bill loaded with earmarks (don’t you hate that word). You never know what position he’s going to take - it’s probably a good thing the Conservatives don’t have to clean up after the mess he would have made. Now let’s get the good guys and gals in the House in 2010!!!

A quick check of ‘maverick’ — nonconformist, unconventional person, eccentric, individualist, rebel, one of a kind, odd one out, loner, oddball, crank, oddity, etc... — take your pick.

I think Sarah will want to drop that title before 2012!


654 posted on 11/07/2008 2:18:23 PM PST by GretchenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 651 | View Replies]

To: hgro

Let’s boycott O’Reilly and Shepard Smith - O’Reilly is such a proponent of boycotts - let’s show him how it feels.

Hate to have to watch it again to get a list of his advertisers - maybe someone who does watch could post a list!


655 posted on 11/07/2008 2:21:54 PM PST by GretchenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 653 | View Replies]

To: mbraynard
If any of the criticisms ARE true, it was the campaign's job to vet Palin, just as Obama should have been vetted by the Dems. On the other hand, much is made of Palin's gaffes while Obama bin Lyin' and Flubber Biden still get a pass.

Maybe some of us are looking for leaders with common sense instead of lofty academic degrees. Was Lincoln a Harvard grad?

p.s. Do we know if these insiders were stealth Obama-ites?

656 posted on 11/07/2008 2:25:37 PM PST by informavoracious (U.S.A. 1776-2008 R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Hurry turn on Fox - they are going to interview Sarah!!!!


657 posted on 11/07/2008 2:49:13 PM PST by GretchenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 656 | View Replies]

To: manc
I am sure they had an argument all ready.

Banning pre-paid credit cards would be DISCRIMINATORY to the POOR with bad credit who cannot qualify for a real credit card with their name imprinted on it.

Kind of like how unfair it is when they cannot qualify for a mortgage.

658 posted on 11/07/2008 2:50:56 PM PST by informavoracious (U.S.A. 1776-2008 R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: GretchenB

IMO they didn’t want to bother with feedback or comments...they knew they’d get blasted by C/conservatives who didn’t like the campaign.


659 posted on 11/07/2008 2:53:57 PM PST by Eagle Eye (Obama's Marxism--Chains you can believe in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 605 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye

You’re probably correct! Guess they haven’t figured out that negative comments are much more constructive than positive ones.

Throw the trash out!!! Gee - sure hope Newt gets the RNC job! Is there anything we (little old volunteers) can do to make it happen?


660 posted on 11/07/2008 3:03:36 PM PST by GretchenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 701-708 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson