Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS Continues to Promote Gay Marriage, Offers No Opposing Views
NewsBusters.org ^ | 11/6/2008 | Kyle Drennen

Posted on 11/06/2008 9:17:13 AM PST by Pyro7480

At the top of Thursday’s CBS Early Show, co-host Julie Chen praised Barack Obama’s election as the first African-American president but lamented the passage of California’s Proposition 8, preventing gay marriage: "One barrier falls, another returns. Married gays in legal limbo protest through the night as California voters ban same-sex unions." At the top of the 8AM hour, correspondent John Blackstone reported: "In disappointment, supporters of same-sex marriage gathered in Los Angeles last night, after the hard-fought campaign over California's Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage, they were on the losing side, but not ready to give up."

Blackstone went on to describe the fight that lay ahead: "This may, however, be just one more battle in California's long war over same-sex marriage. Gay rights advocates have already filed a lawsuit claiming Proposition 8 improperly writes discrimination into the state constitution." A clip was then played of the left-wing mayor of San Francisco, Gavin Newsom: "Never before has our constitution been used to strip rights away." Blackstone did not offer the voice of a single person who supported the proposition.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cbs; cbsnews; earlyshow; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; liberalmedia; prop8
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
More See BS...
1 posted on 11/06/2008 9:17:18 AM PST by Pyro7480
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

CBS continues to show its desperation to create and manipulate biased news. These networks have committed themselves to lefitist propoganda, not journalism or real news reporting. Ignore them. They are useless.


2 posted on 11/06/2008 9:19:14 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Bet they also did not say that 70% of blacks voted for the ban either did they?


3 posted on 11/06/2008 9:22:57 AM PST by CONSERVE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

I stopped watching the TV MSM ages ago. It’s just feed for the ‘masses who are asses’ and can’t think for themselves. I read opposing newspapers if I want different viewpoints, or listen to NPR. The people who voted for ‘O’ are the majority of the viewership.


4 posted on 11/06/2008 9:23:43 AM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

‘Scuse me, but didn’t the people freely and independently vote for Prop. 8?


5 posted on 11/06/2008 9:29:00 AM PST by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

There can be no such thing as a “right” to marry. Marriage is an agreement. No one can guarantee ever finding another to enter into such an agreement. It cannot be a right.

The right to speech, kbr, religion, free press, petitition, etc., are all based in the individual and completely actionable by the individual.

My voice can speak. My hand can carry a gun. My soul can worship God.

My vow can marry without regard to anyone else? I don’t think so.


6 posted on 11/06/2008 9:32:23 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain Pro Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Well considering that they spent the entire campaign doing that for Chairman Hussein and he won, there’s no reason for them to stop now.


7 posted on 11/06/2008 9:32:49 AM PST by Dahoser (America's great untapped alternative energy source: The Founding Fathers spinning in their graves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

on FOX-LA this morn; the weather girl from canada and bill handle of KFI relate it as an amendment that would bring back slavery. as ‘if this is allowed, whats gona stop them from doing this’


8 posted on 11/06/2008 9:34:25 AM PST by Eric Esot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Julie Chen praised Barack Obama’s election as the first African-American president but lamented the passage of California’s Proposition 8, preventing gay marriage:

So Ms Chen laments the “will of the people”, 2000 years of tradition, and the sanctity of marriage?
Too freakin bad for her.


9 posted on 11/06/2008 9:35:32 AM PST by SECURE AMERICA (Coming to You From the Front Lines of Occupied America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dahoser

Well, I’ve been told by some who’ve worked in the media, that a lot are homosexuals, so what can we expect. Personally, I wouldn’t know one if I stepped on it.


10 posted on 11/06/2008 9:37:32 AM PST by tillacum (Let's find conservative veterans who really know how to fight for this country, next time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Liberals will keep bringing the issue back until the vote goes their way (even if it takes 50 years) then they announce, “the people have spoken”.


11 posted on 11/06/2008 9:38:59 AM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Re: One barrier falls, another returns.

The people spoke!

I guess that doesn’t matter if it goes against the wishes of the far left!


12 posted on 11/06/2008 9:40:56 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (Little known fact: Barack Obama translated into Kenyan means "Jimmy Carter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

“In disappointment, supporters of same-sex marriage gathered in Los Angeles last night, after the hard-fought campaign over California’s Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage, they were on the losing side, but not ready to give up.”

LOL! More like “rioted” according to the pictures....

Fags behaving badly.

Lessee: they can pwotest and riot but we are supposed to “celebrate” Zero’s election with grace and poise.
[spit]


13 posted on 11/06/2008 9:41:54 AM PST by Adder (typical basicly decent bitter white person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
There can be no such thing as a “right” to marry. Marriage is an agreement. No one can guarantee ever finding another to enter into such an agreement. It cannot be a right. The right to speech, kbr, religion, free press, petitition, etc., are all based in the individual and completely actionable by the individual.

That makes sense, but seems to fly in the face of the explicitly enumerated Constitutional right to peaceably assemble.

For what it's worth, I agree there's no right to marry, in the sense that the government has no business endorsing sexual relationships at all.

14 posted on 11/06/2008 9:41:57 AM PST by Sloth (What's the difference between taxation and armed robbery, aside from who's doing it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Also, I just got a chain email that says that ABC has sent out a memo banning all patriotic and flag pins...apparently verified by snopes, who knows...

Anyone wanna post that thread? I didn’t see it in latest articles....maybe even have on there ways we can contact ABC News and bug the crap out of them about it....


15 posted on 11/06/2008 9:44:36 AM PST by DrewsMum (My 8 year old son cried when he learned Obama won. He said "I am just so sad for our army people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SECURE AMERICA

I lament the will of the people to in “electing” Buttock.


16 posted on 11/06/2008 9:47:28 AM PST by amishman (The fools picked the POS over the POW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

I attend an assembly.

My feet took me to an assembly.

If I attend a marriage, I’m sitting in the pews. :>)


17 posted on 11/06/2008 9:52:36 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain Pro Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SECURE AMERICA

If all these newsreaders and others that back this queer agenda believe in it so much, why don’t they enter into same-sex unions they so radicaly support? If Julie Chen wants to show her full support of this abomination, have her divorce her hubby and get in bed with another woman. Lead by example Jules. Show us you care that deeply that you would do that. And have everyone else like her do the same thing. Live with that choice long enough and they will ALL change their minds about the queer agenda. They will have seen the dark side of it.


18 posted on 11/06/2008 9:58:41 AM PST by NCC-1701 (DRILL NOW. DRILL OFTEN. DRILL 24/7/365. PAY LESS. SUCK THE GROUND DRY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Ignore them, maybe they’ll go away.


19 posted on 11/06/2008 10:10:32 AM PST by CanaGuy (Go Harper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The pro marriage propositions may have been defeated had the
gay “rights” people not been poised to force public schools to teach gay relationships as completely, utterly normal and no different from hetero relationships.

Also gay activists have always claimed they just want to be left alone. However they have brought their lifestyle into the public square - google Folsom st. fair Gay pride day or Gay parade and see the truth of their “private lives”.


20 posted on 11/06/2008 11:15:55 AM PST by biscuit jane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson