A rather ludicrous charge given that quite a number of current GOP officials/candidates, et al, were running as Dems in recent years when running as a Republican was an impossible task in the state.
"I'm afraid Kennedy holding Mary to 52%-46% was actually well ahead of what he might have done, he wasn't close in most polls, but he was riding the McCain wave and probably picked up a lot of votes."
At first, I thought Zimmer in NJ would go higher, but he ended up at about 43%.
"(As it was, Kennedy did win the Alexandria area, which Landrieu won last time if I remember right)"
If you're referring exclusively to Rapides Parish, Landrieu has never carried it in her 3 runs (47% in '96; 46% in '02; 45% last Tuesday). These were the maps for the races (remember I don't use the newsspeak, Red is Democrat here):
1996.
2002.
2008.
"I think Kennedy just didn't have a powerful enough message other than, "I'm the conservative, she's the big-spending liberal."
Of course, if the rodents can win on the vacuous and meaningless mantra of "change", that is a helluva lot more specific and substantive...
"But hey, we still gave it a go down here (plus we got the Baker seat back!)."
Presuming it's not swapped for the McCrery seat... And why can't we sack Melonball ? Why did Tauzin try that boneheaded deal of trying to install his unqualified kid ? Ugh.
"Unlike say, Arkansas, South Dakota, Montana, and Iowa, where the GOP just conceded them all. Meanwhile, the Dems are winning states like Oregon and North Carolina with virtual nobodies..."
I'd have put the guy in charge of Senate recruitment this cycle in front of a firing squad for dereliction of duty. What a f*cking embarrassment.