What a bunch of fools those Obama voters are.
They are all Chicago thugs.
Emanuel, Chief of the Brownshirts.
FROM THE ARCHIVES: How Chicago's profane, ruthless, savvy operative, remade the Democrats in his image
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/obama/chi-0611120215nov12,0,2221283.story
Murtha for CJCS! He can be reinstated as a marine general by the president right?
The Clinton WH staff behaved like thugs, shouting people down on tv all the time. Very inappropriate.
"Emanuel was born in Chicago, Illinois in 1959. His father, the Jerusalem-born Benjamin M. Emanuel, is a pediatrician and was a member of the Irgun, a militant Zionist group considered a terrorist organization"Meet the Neo Boss, same as the Old Boss.---The Who?What would Tzvi do?
temper and hate isn’t the only thing. He’s got Freddie Mac creds
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2126405/posts
also this is an excellent critique
Emanuel [Yuval Levin]
Obama’s apparent selection of Rahm Emanuel for White House chief of staff is an extremely disconcerting (if not wholly surprising) first indication on the “which Obama will we get” question. It suggests both that he wants to be ruthless and partisan and that he does not have a clear sense of how the White House works.
Emanuel was by all accounts a very effective White House staffer in the Clinton administration, and he has certainly been an effective member of the House of Representatives. He is smart and tough. But he has been, in both positions, a vicious graceless partisan: narrow, hectic, unremittingly aggressive, vulgar, and impatient. Those who have worked for and with him come away impressed but not inspired, and generally not loyal.
The White House chief of staff is not a chief strategist or a chief advocate. He is a manager of people and of process. Above all else, he sets the tone internally, and shapes the president’s decision process and the feel of the upper tiers of the administration. Obama is especially in need of someone who will lead him to decisions, because he appears to be intensely averse to making difficult choices—which is the essence of what the president does. His inclination is to step back and conceptualize the choice out of existence, looking reasonable but doing nothing. To overcome this, he will need a chief of staff with a sense of the gravity of the choices the president faces, and one capable of moving the staff to decision, keeping big egos satisfied and calm, and resisting the pressure to be purely reactive to momentary distractions. None of this spells Rahm Emanuel. There is definitely a place for a Rahm Emanuel type of brilliant ruthless shark in a White House staff, but not in the Chief’s office. Not a good first sign.
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NzliZTRkMGQ3MGYxZjM0ZTg2YjQyNjZjODZlNTY1YmE=
This is going from a headache to a nightmare in a hurry... it’s sad when you’re pinning your hopes on Tony Rezko.
Rahm Emmanuel is an example of “civility” in the Marxist Party.
The Obama White House will be a Rats’ nest of high crimes and treason. John Kerry is knocking at the door for Secretary of State, and the dullard dork will probably get appointed.
Either the Republicans fight back with a BACKBONE and a COHERENT CONSERVATIVE PROGRAM and save the country, or they try to “play ball” to curry favor with the Washington Post and send the country even further into the crapper.
There is a lot to admire about John McCain, but his service to conservatism isn’t really one of them. Let his fate be an object lesson to others.
PS Are there any conservatives out there willing to buy up more media outlets? :)
Waxman to challenge Dingell (House Oversight Battle)
Politico | 11/05/08 | Patrick O’Connor
Posted on 11/05/2008 11:47:38 AM PST by Kieri
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2126245/posts
[snip] This puts the Californian in a direct conflict with Energy and Commerce Chairman John Dingell (Mich.), the dean of the House and a long-time Waxman rival, for the top spot of one of the most powerful committees in Congress. [end]
Former World Jewish Congress chief Bronfman endorses ‘tough idealist’ Obama
haaretz.com | 10/31/08
Posted on 10/31/2008 1:07:10 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2121063/posts
I admire Rahm Emanuel. At least he’s got balls, unlike the pathetic pussy McCain. Who else here is sick and tired of “classy” Republicans who lose?
This is Obama reaching out - to the Clintonista wing of his party.
The rest of us can go to hell.
Heading should be “Obama wastes no time breaking Campaign Promises”
Obama voters are suckers in the worst way... Wait till they get a load of the change thats really comin.... LOL>...
Mark my words Bread and soup lines before his term is out and you will be told that it is only you that is doing poorly the rest of America is chugging along just fine...
Mistake. You don’t appoint a knife-man as your Chief of Staff. That position requires a lot of different things. A knife-man in that position will end up being hated by his own side more than the opposition. He controls access to the President and has to have some level of diplomacy and tact or he ends up being seen as an obstacle and targeted.