[King of Florida]

Not a good sign for McCain, if one goes by results in the last 5 presidential elections:

2004: Bush 19 Kerry 7
2000: Bush 21 Gore 5
1996: Dole 18 Clinton 8
1992: Bush 15 Perot 8 Clinton 2
1988: Bush 34 Dukakis 3

[dascallie]

Dixville Notch voted overwhelming for Obama in the NH primary. As a matter of fact, Hillary didn’t get one vote.
However, we all know who won the NH primary....Hillary.
So, now you should adjust your little theory.
They don’t have a history of being an indicator.

[Stars&StripesNE]

They were way off in 96 and 92. That’s encouraging.

[wideawake]

Hmmm . . . they had 37 voters in 1988 and now they have 21 voters.

The sample, too small to be reliably predictive to begin with, is now 43% smaller.

[alicewonders]

I’m finding it incredibly difficult to believe that people that voted overwhelming Republican in past elections all the way back to 1988 - have suddenly completely turned about & voted for Barack Obama! WTH???

[Bender2]

Re: Not a good sign for McCain, if one goes by results in the last 5 presidential elections:
2004: Bush 19 Kerry 7
2000: Bush 21 Gore 5
1996: Dole 18 Clinton 8
1992: Bush 15 Perot 8 Clinton 2
1988: Bush 34 Dukakis 3

To the Electoral Maps, Batman!

2004 Kerry takes NH
2000 W takes NH
1996 Clinton takes NH
1992 Clinton takes NH
1988 Bush 41 takes NH

Now, King, tell me... how you come by your conclusion?

These results tell me diddlysquat!

However, I do believe if Johnny & The Babe take NH, it points at a GOP win. If not, it is not the kiss of death.

Now, if the Koolaid drinkers & ACORN steal PA, OH, VA and FL... my Wednesday morning will be hell!