not sure... I cannot figure out from his analysis why he thinks polling does not account for PUMAs defecting? It can really only be explained by two factors: 1) PUMAs lying to pollsters or 2) PUMAs not responding to pollsters (or not answering the phone). I wish his analysis to be accurate, but I do not see how a (presumably) legit polling operation would not catch a PUMA shift into the McPalin camp. Either PUMAs are playing games, or he seriously overestimates the PUMA effect. Someone please tell me I’m wrong, or have missed the ‘operation chaos’ part of the PUMA plan.
I have NO CLUE what’s going on with his graphs and $hit but he says we only need 278,961 PUMA votes to tie?
The founder of PUMA says there are at least 4.5 million PUMA voters.
I don’t get this stuff but if he is right, he will be a SUPERSTAR with his great analyst com Wednesday.
probably wishful thinking..... Off to go smoke another cig sniff sniff....
My first impression is he is adding votes to a column that already has them added to it. There are not that many to throw off the stats and not all will be lying to pollsters.
We are like a drowning man and right now, anything that concludes a McCain win will be something to try and grab unto even if it is sinking.