Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor
Range lands and wolves, and lions are not related. Raising bovines and ruminants is. This is what the west is about; its traditional America.

Were these laws really meant to cover bison? I have no idea, but was anyone actually raising bison back when these laws were passed? I would be surprised if that was the case. I think these laws were meant to cover "standard" livestock.

72 posted on 11/04/2008 7:42:38 AM PST by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Citizen Blade

At the time that most of the laws were passed, the bison were still fairly plentiful in the wild; there was no economic motive to ‘raise’ them. Later they were hunted almost to extinction, because the meat was in demand.


73 posted on 11/04/2008 7:56:47 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Obama isn't just an empty suit, he's a Suit-Bomb trying to sneak into the White House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson