Replies

Wow. I had you pegged as a steady, long time freeper. I see I was right about you being a long time poster...

"Your right to swing your fist ends at my jaw." (Will Rogers) Your right to graze your animals ends at my property line is my take on this one. Colorado law notwithstanding; after all as a "long time freeper" (whatever that implies) you should understand that the law is not always just. An obvious example would be the Kelo case. Law on one side reason on the other. Same here. I see friends of the guy that owned the bison stepped right up to the bat with comments like "hang him" Nice. What i've taken out of this is that you (collective not necessarily you individual) think that

It is OK to allow your animals to destroy other peoples' property, but it is not Ok for other people to destroy your property (animals)
that as long as the person whose property is being destroyed is "rich" or a "carpetbagger" that his property is fair game (and this is what Obama and his supporters espouse too - stick it to the rich)
That bison are legally considered domestic livestock although they are destructive and dangerous with only North American mammal more danerous being bears. Since all of you seem to think that there is an equivalence, I'd like those who consider bison as domesticated to walk through a herd of them like I used to walk through a herd of angus steers. Biggest problem with the cattle was that you'd get steer snot on your clothes when they checked you out for food. The odds are pretty good that you'd get a bit worse from the bison.

Y'all seem hung up on the legality of it and ignoring the sense of it.

Y'all seem hung up on the legality of it and ignoring the sense of it.

You seem to side with the rich city slicker carpetbaggers.
Hawn wasn't real neighborly.
Check the timeline.
Or just maybe he was set up by the former owner, his foreman.