[from occupied ga]

Hey there Obama supporters. Nice to see that y'all won't mind when the Obomination wins, since you are stridently supporting his share the wealth of the wealthy in this thread. Y'all seem to think that the bison guy has every right to send his Bison to roam loose because of open range laws. He may have had the legality of it, but the law doesn't make it right only legal.

• first, the open range laws were writtten in the 1800's when cattle were what the applied to. At that time every rancher in his right mind considered Bison to be dangerous nusances to be killed on sight (and they did)
• Second, no one has answered my point about someone raising wolves or mauntain lions and letting them run free, and oh BTW if you don't want them on your property it's YOUR responsibility to keep them out. Both wolves and mountin lions are considered less dangerous than Bison.

So nice to see socialism alive and well here on FR Hope you enjoy the coming sharing of your wealth .

[jazusamo]

LOL! Give it up or show us where open range laws include cougars and wolves. Evidently the open range law in CO includes bison or the turkey wouldn’t have been charged.

[editor-surveyor]

Occupied, you know that you are way off base here.

Range lands and wolves, and lions are not related. Raising bovines and ruminants is. This is what the west is about; its traditional America. We really hat it when big city libs like yourself pretend to know what American freedom and liberty is about. If you want to buy a ranch, do it, but don’t try to bring your inner city concepts of ‘neighbors’ and right and wrong; they won’t fit. OK?

[george76]

We have been polite answering your questions.

We are not Obama supporters. You can check for yourself.

Throwing out personal insults shows that you losing on the facts and on the law.

---

Your “ point about someone raising wolves or mauntain lions and letting them run free...” would be treated differently under Colorado law.

---

If you or ( Jeff Hawn ) do not want to live under Colorado laws, then stay away.

---

You still ignore that facts of the case :

the bulk of the bison — 14 of them — were killed on land owned by Catherine Pimm.

Eight were killed on Bureau of Land Management property,

four on U.S. Forest Service property,

three on property of Robert Lemm

three on Hawn’s ranch.

Jeffrey Scott Hawn pleaded guilty to one count each of criminal mischief and animal cruelty .

[MileHi]

Wow. I had you pegged as a steady, long time freeper. I see I was right about you being a long time poster...

[Uri’el-2012]

Hey there Obama supporters. Nice to see that y'all won't mind when the Obomination wins, since you are stridently supporting his share the wealth of the wealthy in this thread. Y'all seem to think that the bison guy has every right to send his Bison to roam loose because of open range laws. He may have had the legality of it, but the law doesn't make it right only legal. first, the open range laws were writtten in the 1800's when cattle were what the applied to. At that time every rancher in his right mind considered Bison to be dangerous nusances to be killed on sight (and they did) no one has answered my point about someone raising wolves or mauntain lions and letting them run free, and oh BTW if you don't want them on your property it's YOUR responsibility to keep them out. Both wolves and mountin lions are considered less dangerous than Bison.

Buffalo are considered livestock in Colorado.

Mountain lions and wolves are not considered livestock.

Current Colorado law is "fence out".

If Hawn were not a city slicker "carpetbagger" from Texas,
he would have had his attorney check the law books
before killing someone else's livestock.

In 19th century Park county, Hawn would have been hung !

[Emperor Palpatine]

You sir, are full of male bovine excrement.

Read some history and understand the tradition of the American West before you shoot your mouth off and reveal what little you know.