What’s so funny about the State of Hawaii not accepting a COLB for determining who is a “native Hawaiian”? The COLB does not have enough information to determine if someone is a “native Hawaiian”, but apparently the birth certificate does. Obama never claimed to be a “native Hawaiian”.
What was funny to me (in an ironic sort of way) is that the State of Hawaii has different standards of proof, depending on whether or not money is involved. Why not require a BC for proof of citizenship? Because to the state, citizenship status is not as important as its bogus concept of “native authenticity.”