Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Virginia State Court Dismisses Action Challenging Obama's Eligibility to be President
ObamaCrimes.com ^ | Nov. 3 | WildBill

Posted on 11/03/2008 11:20:35 AM PST by Sibre Fan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
FYI
1 posted on 11/03/2008 11:20:36 AM PST by Sibre Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan

CALL FOR ACTION:

Please, all Fellow FREEPERS, please consider doing the following to prevent this mess of questionable eligibility from ever happening again:

Call your State Senator, your State Representative and your Governor and ask them to provide simple legislation to give the Secretary of State the right, responsibility and obligation to confirm eligibility BEFORE ANYONE can go onto the ballot.

Personally, I think the best way to contact them is by phone during business hours, then a follow up by e-mail or mail to the person you talked to, then a follow-up a week or so later, but you can do what you think is best.

Practically, this would require all future candidates to fill out an application with supporting documentation, which could then be checked out by the Secretary of State’s office.

I don’t know about you, but THIS idea seems a better use of our governments time then providing yet another social program designed to ruin people by not having them be accountable to their families (a basic problem).

If there is an enterprising lawyer or legislator on Free Republic who would like to provide well written sample legislation which could be submitted as a suggestion across the country, it would provide a basis for continuity.

Hope there are many, many people across the country who are willing to do this now, and after the election.

Remember..... 2012 is coming!


2 posted on 11/03/2008 11:22:21 AM PST by The Californian (You can borrow brains, but you can't borrow character. Bob Jones, Sr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan

Atleast this judge wasnt an asshole like that one in Philly.


3 posted on 11/03/2008 11:22:30 AM PST by se_ohio_young_conservative (Sarah for VP !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan

I usually vote against judges locally. If they have not done something good that I remember at poll time it is no for them.


4 posted on 11/03/2008 11:23:39 AM PST by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Californian

bump!


5 posted on 11/03/2008 11:23:50 AM PST by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan

I’m willing to bet this judge is a Democrat and this is a partisan decision.

And he’s an idiot.


6 posted on 11/03/2008 11:24:05 AM PST by Emperor Palpatine ("Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan

So at least this court has seen a valid BC. Case closed.


7 posted on 11/03/2008 11:26:51 AM PST by arrogantsob (Hero vs Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan

This seems to be the most detailed ruling. Bump


8 posted on 11/03/2008 11:27:10 AM PST by mnehring (We Are Joe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan

How about a link to the article, not to the chat forum on Berg’s site.


9 posted on 11/03/2008 11:29:37 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan

One MAJOR problem, the Constitution was created to define the form of government for the PEOPLE. Congress does not have standing to determine the eligibility of the President INDEPENDENT of the people. Since the 16th Amendment (if I remember corretly, don’t shoot me here) allowed for direct election of representatives the previous dynamic was forever altered and the people of the country possess the power of direct action upon the government. Further, the Fourteenth Amendment forever altered the Federal state dynamic so that the line of demarcation between state and federal was certainly blurred, if not altogether eradicated (although there is a shell of it upheld at a Federal court’s “discretion” through abstentions).

The reality is there CAN NOT BE A PROVISION OF THE CONSTITUTION THAT CAN NOT HAVE EFFECT. Therefore to suggest no on has standing to bring the action is bogus, no matter how much integrity the judge may have. And to suggest that an individual citizen does not have standing to determine if a “FOREIGN INVADER” is not trying to illegally usurp power through demagoguery and deceit is equally a bunch of trash...


10 posted on 11/03/2008 11:33:29 AM PST by woodb01 (ANTI-DNC Web Portal at ---> http://www.noDNC.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Emperor Palpatine

Not sure why you think he’s an idiot.

A certificate of live birth makes BO a citizen. Plus there is an affidavit from someone in Hawaii attesting to this.

This doesn’t answer all questions, such as why BO didn’t just present this before and whether or not there is anything embarrassing on the BC, but it does make him a citizen, whether we like it or not.

Other than getting some legislation to keep this from happening again, I think it sounds like the end of this line.


11 posted on 11/03/2008 11:34:20 AM PST by Aria ("An America that could elect Sarah Palin might still save itself." Vin Suprynowicz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan
LOL! I note that the State of Hawaii does not accept a COLB as a valid BC for the purpose of determining eligibility for the special benefits and privileges of being a "native Hawaiian;" However, it does accept a COLB as valid for determining citizenship.
12 posted on 11/03/2008 11:46:10 AM PST by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan
What is so wrong in the AMERICAN folk knowing where this candidate is born??? The mediaWHORES went after McCain like vultures over his BC!! What is SO FREAKIN WRONG ON US KNOWNING where OsAMA was born? EVERY candidate for president SHOULD be FORCED to show the AMERICAN FOLK prove of his residency in the US!!! ONE freakin judge could so simply blow away ANY doubt by just ruling that OsAMAN needs to show his BC...WHAT'S SO FREAKIN HARD ABOUT THAT???!!What a mess!
13 posted on 11/03/2008 11:49:00 AM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

No, it hasn’t.


14 posted on 11/03/2008 11:49:05 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Aria
A certificate of live birth makes BO a citizen. Plus there is an affidavit from someone in Hawaii attesting to this.

You've bought the spin. The officials in HI have stated that they have verified there is a vault copy (original). They have not stated any of the details. There is still question. IIRC, HI has a law on the books that says they'll issue a BC even if not born in HI (place of birth would be noted, however), it has been linked on many threads here. I'll see if I can find it.

The simplest of answers to the most basic of questions. Why won't B.O. release it?

15 posted on 11/03/2008 11:53:14 AM PST by IYAS9YAS (Ever notice that Obama supporters chant "O-Bahm-AH" while McCain/Palin supporters chant "U-S-A".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS; Aria
Here it is. Post number 51 in this thread has a link and an explanation.

www.Free Republic.com

16 posted on 11/03/2008 12:00:32 PM PST by IYAS9YAS (Ever notice that Obama supporters chant "O-Bahm-AH" while McCain/Palin supporters chant "U-S-A".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: riverdawg

What’s so funny about the State of Hawaii not accepting a COLB for determining who is a “native Hawaiian”? The COLB does not have enough information to determine if someone is a “native Hawaiian”, but apparently the birth certificate does. Obama never claimed to be a “native Hawaiian”.


17 posted on 11/03/2008 12:01:02 PM PST by Crystal Cove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS
1. The Certification of Live Birth presented to the court is unquestionably authentic.

The court noted that the certification had a raised seal from the state of Hawaii, had a stamp bearing the signature of the registrar of vital statistics. The court found “wholly unpersuasive” any of the internet claims that the birth certificate was altered in any way. Furthermore, the document itself was accompanied by an affidavit from the State Health Director (of Hawaii) verifying that the document is an authentic certification of live birth. The court held that there could be no doubt that the document was authentic unless one believed that the state of Hawaii’s health department were in on an elaborate and complex conspiracy – and that there is not a shred of evidence that this is the case.

I'd like him to not be a valid US citizen as much as any of us but I don't see how this is spin. They have a certificate of live birth in Hawaii from what the court said. I do find it strange that we haven't been shown the real one - in fact it's worse than strange. We the people shouldn't have things like this hidden from us. Shows how much this creep respects us.

18 posted on 11/03/2008 12:04:08 PM PST by Aria ("An America that could elect Sarah Palin might still save itself." Vin Suprynowicz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Aria

I am sorry, you are wrong. A COLB from Hawaii does not make you a citizen. Bozo’s sister has one and everyone knows, without a doubt, she was born in Indonesia. What needs to be seen is the vault copy of a BIRTH CERTIFICATE, not a COLB.


19 posted on 11/03/2008 12:04:16 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS
Why won't B.O. release it?

Because the released document suffices as proof that the state of Hawaii acknowledges BHO as a natural-born citizen, and that is enough, failing overriding proof of ineligibility (of which there is none of yet).

Circumstantial evidence of disqualification fails in light of certification of live birth in the USA. "I don't believe it" is not legal proof compelling disqualification. ...and given that, why the he11 would he want to disclose the original BC?

20 posted on 11/03/2008 12:04:37 PM PST by ctdonath2 (I AM JOE THE PLUMBER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson