To: word_warrior_bob
Actually, it could well be both FAKE (contrived) and yet 100% accurate and on target, i.e. it really tells what is going on behind the scenes, at the same time. I know they sould like mutual contradictions, but put your mind in an Asian funk and it makes sense. Someone who knows exactly what is happening within Camp Obama without direct knowledge but through analysis and various open sources and other clues, and then just verbalizes what a pissed off internal person would write--just speaks their words for them.
I dont think it is disinfo to get us off game is what I am saying.
14 posted on
10/31/2008 12:53:01 AM PDT by
AmericanInTokyo
(Job One: DEFEAT OBAMA. Job Two: Win or Lose, A TOTAL De-RINOfication of the G.O.P. on all levels!!)
To: AmericanInTokyo
Another words a Jason Blair article? Perhaps, but it rings true to everything we're seeing. If it's “fake”, it was written by a highly intelligent individual or a relative/close friend of an insider.
18 posted on
10/31/2008 1:00:54 AM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(Barack Obama: In Error and arrogant -- he's errogant!)
To: AmericanInTokyo
Actually, it could well be both FAKE (contrived) and yet 100% accurate and on target Like Dan Rather: Fake, but accurate?
57 posted on
10/31/2008 4:50:18 AM PDT by
SC Swamp Fox
(Join our Folding@Home team (Team# 36120) keyword: folding)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson