To: mnehrling
I like even less the fact that we have a fraud running on a major party ticket.
4 posted on
10/30/2008 9:46:56 PM PDT by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: pissant
Congress sets the date of elections. I don’t think the Court has the authority to change it.
11 posted on
10/30/2008 9:56:41 PM PDT by
arrogantsob
(Hero vs Zero)
To: pissant
I like even less the fact that we have a fraud running on a major party ticket. I agree 100%. I'd rather have no election than someone who 1)possibly not a citizen 2) morally bankrupt and 3) has terrorism ties.
13 posted on
10/30/2008 10:00:22 PM PDT by
Txngal
To: pissant
>”Until that time,” Surrick says, “voters do not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that Plaintiff attempts to bring.”<
Then explain “By the people, for the people” please.
I know I read that somewhere...
14 posted on
10/30/2008 10:00:27 PM PDT by
Califreak
(Hope -n- Che'nge is the battle cry of the zombies.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson