They are getting worried about Rat voters thinking it’s in the bag and therefore not voting.
... and well they should.
When it is "Broken Glass" vs "Lazy A$$", BG wins every time.
Anti-War Democrats should not waste their votes for Obama. After all, Obama has this thing in the bag, anyway.
Obama has backed away for his call for an immediate withdrawl from Iraq, and is even talking about increasing troop levels in Afghanistan. Now Joe Biden is saying we will probably be involved in a whole new war within six months of Obama being sworn in. A vote for Obama is a vote for more war.
Now, if Obama needed the votes to beat John McCain, an anti-War Democrat might be justified in picking the more anti-War candidate of the two. But Obama is up by twenty points across-the-board, so there is no reason to pick the lesser of two evils.
Anti-War Democrats should take this opportunity to cast a strong symbolic vote for the only truly anti-War candidate in the race, Ralph Nader. Nader is calling for an immediate withdrawl from both Iraq and Afghanistan, and would reduce the military budgets to the point where fighting future wars is not even an option. Nader would put an end to American adventurism and imperialism, once and for all.
Tell you anti-War friends, don’t waste your vote on Obama. Vote Nader in 2008!
Acting like a very close race is over is not a smart move. Lots of people, especially younger voters will think it will be so lopsided they don't need to actually vote.
That is why they are trying to have these morons vote the day they register. Because of their short attention spans they will forget to vote.