Posted on 10/28/2008 2:30:15 PM PDT by jzlouis
I think that if it is to get tossed from the Circuit Court of Appeals, which it will or from the Supreme Court, it would be better the latter as that would give it more exposure.
Then maybe someone will ask Obama WHY? The big WHY aren’t you simpley providing the public your pedigree, something that every president has done since the begining.
Doubtlessly, the press will want to know more about him as president. So why not show it now than later, is it because it will change the complexion of the election?
I can’t believe that not one MSM or someone from the McCain campaign or Hannity or someone doesn’t bring this up?
What is stopping them?
hmmmm constitutional crisis and chaos? i think so...
2) that the harm can be traced to the conduct of the defendant
certainly...
3) and that adjudication of the matter can provide a remedy to that harm
sure- kick him off the ballot
I have a feeling that if Berg had the original Kenyan birth certificate, a movie of the birth taking place in Kenya and 100 witnesses that all signed sworn statements to the fact, Obama would still not be questioned.
In my life, I never thought I would see the day when so many would just toss aside any air of objectivity just to win an election. What happens if after the election facts come out that Obama is foreign born? Who would have the guts to remove him?
What’s it all mean?
I love this that he cannot establish “injury in fact”...That a candidate can hoist a massive fraud on the voters does not constitute “injury in fact”..I just love courts and attorneys.
After the election, when the real election is pending (the Electoral College), if someone of competence and substance wants to bring a case that will hold up in court and get a decision on the merits, I stand ready to help.
Congressman Billybob
Latest article, "Brides from a War Long Ago"
The Declaration, the Constitution, parts of the Federalist, and America's Owner's Manual, here.
I have come to the conclusion that the fastest way, and possibly the only way at this point in time, to expose the fact that Obama refuses to provide his birth certificate, is to keep yelling it from the rooftops until the media cannot ignore it. Hannity and others are doing that, but they need our help. Protest our right, as Americans, to have proof that a person running for President does indeed meet the three basic requirements.
Everyone who has sworn an oath to defend the Constitution, not the President, from all enemies foreign and domestic. That's who.
Would it be fair to say that no one has standing until Obama actually “wins” the election? If so, would this be because no one has been potentially damaged until that time?
RE: “It has been suggested that Tim Russert had the “whitey” tapes. Anyone have any information on whether this could be true?”
****
If Russert had whitey tapes, I’d bet they are with him in his grave.
Oh and the far leftist Federal Judges are saints...give me a break.
The Surrick court said there's no damage until he's elected. Potential damage is a different matter--but it would take a court with brass stones to issue an injunction (i.e., stop running until you produce proof of citizenship)on this matter.
John / Billybob
John / Billybob
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.