[John Valentine]

OK, let’s say I agree that Romney is off the hook - at least for now, benefit of the doubt and all that... if these guys are carrying the torch for Romney and undercutting our candidates, would you agree that they ought to be cleaned out, WHOEVER THEY ARE, and if they turn out to be Romney loyalists, THEN Romney ought to say something?

[NYC Republican]

Of course. ANYONE undercutting out team needs to be cleaned out... with few exceptions (i.e. We need Chabliss to prevent a filibuster-proof majority, even though he's strayed off the reservation many times)...

If Romney had anything to do with this, if it's EVEN true (I doubt it is), I would join the folks who despise him.

[MaggieCarta]

OK, let’s say I agree that Romney is off the hook - at least for now, benefit of the doubt and all that... if these guys are carrying the torch for Romney and undercutting our candidates, would you agree that they ought to be cleaned out, WHOEVER THEY ARE, and if they turn out to be Romney loyalists, THEN Romney ought to say something?

It's hardly my place to advise the Romney camp.

How much control does a candidate have over people who no longer work for him? This all seems really quite silly.

This is an unsourced article.