Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: perfect_rovian_storm; LS; Perdogg

This one doesn’t do anything for me. He was essentially talking about the original Constitution allowing slavery, which he says created problems that last to this day. Typical liberal pablum, yes, but nothing on the order of threatening to confiscate the hard-earned wealth of productive American citizens and then redistributing it to those who hadn’t earned it. Which, incidentally, is classic Marxism (”From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs” — Marx said it.)


27 posted on 10/26/2008 7:24:28 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: kesg

To me, saying that the Constitution itself represents a fundamental flaw in the country is far worse, but yes, the other does play more into the current campaign narrative and shows Zero to be the Marxist that he is.


29 posted on 10/26/2008 7:26:10 PM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (You MUST see this website: http://www.neverfindout.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: kesg

-—but nothing on the order of threatening to confiscate the hard-earned wealth of productive American citizens and then redistributing it to those who hadn’t earned it—

How very odd that you use the exact word that Obama uses in denying that he is advocating REDISTRIBUTION. Have you had a serious head injury on the left side of your head?

He said: put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributed change

He said: but I’m not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive change through the courts.


36 posted on 10/26/2008 7:33:41 PM PDT by sgtyork (The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage. Thucydides)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: kesg
Listen to Obama's words again. This isn't typical liberal stuff:

It [The Warren Court] didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren court interpreted it in the same way that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states can’t do to you, it says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf.

A Harvard Law Grad knows why the Constitution was crafted this way -- it wasn't for the new socialist order Obama intends to impose on the USA.

72 posted on 10/26/2008 8:36:33 PM PDT by Niord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: kesg

Pretty easy of HO-bama...he was niether BORN HERE, or RAISED HERE, yet has the AUDACITY to claim he’s the best to solve our “problems” that he and his own party GENERATED for an election issue.


74 posted on 10/26/2008 8:53:04 PM PDT by RasterMaster (DUmocrats - the party of slavery, sedition, subversion, socialism & surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson