Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WoofDog123

>>>Should read “looked for the most pragmatic way to bow out.’”... more accurate?

I understand your original point, but it doesn’t change my view of the judge.

I don’t see very much difference in the terminology.
I listened to Berg on Savage Nation. His position didn’t sound fringe or meaningless to me.

Is that what our justice system is about?... finding the most pragmatic way of passing the buck?

Our court system is OVERLOADED because lower courts dont have the BALLS to live up to their oath of defending the constitution! Consider all of the valid appeals to SCOTUS that will never see the light of day because lower court judges are either YELLOW or CORRUPT!

Pragmatic? isn’t that kind of like calling a gaff a rhetorical flourish? (not to insult)


307 posted on 10/25/2008 9:20:46 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies ]


To: Safrguns

i think, to my jaded mind, pragmatic is a government judicial employee deciding they really want out of this one, and thus letting the probable winner of the election, in their opinion (?), write their opinion, hoping to avoid a generation of IRS audits for all of their children and grandchildren.


310 posted on 10/25/2008 9:35:35 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson