Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigh4u2

As I understand it, and I could be wrong on this, Republicans started asking why they would need that particular clause IN there, clearly it didn’t apply to McCain and so it was forced out. They backed off rather than reveal why they needed it.


203 posted on 10/25/2008 6:20:15 PM PDT by Danae (Obama = Trickle up Poverty. Don't like it, get ready to be"reeducated" into it if he is elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]


To: Danae; All

Does anyone know what the wording was that the sponsors of the resolution wanted in, but ended up being left out?


332 posted on 10/25/2008 9:57:47 PM PDT by Flamenco Lady (Proud to be a pitbull that wears lipstick too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson