Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dajjal

“...the judge said Berg’s allegations of harm were “too vague and too attenuated” to confer standing on him or any other voters.”

Apparently, this judge would rather wait until the Constitution is completely destroyed before “allegations of harm” are more concrete.

What a maroon.


22 posted on 10/25/2008 2:16:43 AM PDT by Stingray ("Stand for the truth or you'll fall for anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Stingray

This was never going to go anywhere, it was just a distraction from real issues.


32 posted on 10/25/2008 2:52:33 AM PDT by Caranda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Stingray
“too vague and too attenuated”

What a twisted selection of words by one of our beloved black robed tyrants. Judicial subterfuge at it's finest.

Battlestations ALL. Defeat the Fraud come Nov. 4th.

176 posted on 10/25/2008 8:45:22 AM PDT by tflabo (:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson