Probably for the same reason the media ignored Berg's earlier RICO lawsuit against Bush alleging that he was behind 9/11.
Kooks and wackos file lawsuits daily in the U.S. alleging the wildest and most outlandish things imaginable against government officials and other well-known entities.
You dive into this kooky muck and lend it credence, the kooky muck stays on you and makes you look like a kook, too.
Legally -- and even assuming all of the birth certificate allegations are true (which I frankly do not believe, no more than I believe Bush was behind 9/11) -- none of these plaintiffs have standing to challenge Obama's eligibility to be president. Why? Because none of them have suffered a special injury that's different from any other voter. And that's just for starters.
Also, this new suit is totally wacko because the response to the complaint is not due until over a week after the election.
There are 10 or 11 lawsuits now regarding his birth certificate. It is not just Berg. I dont like berg myself either but if you listen to the case it is hard to deny in my opinion. I have read everything on both sides. Like the fact that he posted a scanned copy of the birth certificate on his website. Thats fine but its still not providing the paper copy of the certificate. That is just a computer image which can be altered very easily. I also realize that Factcheck.org says they got to actually see the certificate physically. Problem is Fact Check is part of Annenburg and has been funded by Ayers and Obama. Plus the people that looked at the certificate at Fact Check were not experts on birth certificates. I also do not understand why he would provide the certificate to a website and not to a court of law. Do you?? And considering Berg is not the only one with a lawsuit and all of these other people are coming after him why would he not just want to clear it up?
Please explain this to us laymen, Mr. Attorney. Thank you!!!