Did you see the interview? And you don’t agree that he thought he had a “gotcha” moment with the question insinuating that even a conservative publication like National Review thought she was stupid and/or incompetent?
How would a person reasonably be expected to respond to a question like that?
However moot, now I take the time to respond.
Yes, Pachy, I saw and read the interview.
The portion Griffin cited from THE NATIONAL REVIEW:
Watching press coverage of the Republican candidate for vice president, it’s sometimes hard to decide whether Sarah Palin is incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt, backward, or — or, well, all of the above.
Griffin said NR said it, rather than that NR said people give that impression. As a lawyer states inadmissable evidence during trial and then apologizes, NR presented the above premise to its readers.
Griffin asked Palin for her response to it. At the end of the interview Griffin also admitted to Palin that “we” (CNN) would not likely have given Palin a similar “pass” afforded Joe Biden.
Pretty candid, IMHO.
Also note Griffin interviews exposing Obama’s winning his first election by clearing the ballot of all challengers; Exposing ACORN of impropriety in Obama’s favor, etc.
The point remains, judge after reviewing the available information.
Best wishes to you, yours, and us all in the coming years.