Heck, one of 'em is still stammering and spluttering away at me, on another thread, even as we speak; shrilly insisting that he's still "right" in having uncritically swallowed it all, somehow.
It's just adorable, is all. Really. Like having my very own pet spider monkey. ;)
And I pasted the police description under the legit wire photo early in the discussion when it was said that it was her RIGHT cheek that had been scratched at a time that some were suspecting that the media had “flipped” the image, I never made the claim that the image had been faked, nor did I ever offer an excuse as to how to B came out backwards. (note to others: Her right cheek would appear on the Left side of a photo, just as her right hand would...)
Are those real bruises or makeup?
I never jumped the gun in claiming someone to be a fraud. Does she have a black eye or not? Does such a claim that it was "only makeup" if it wasn't “not matter” if such a claim is “fake but accurate” in that she still faked the assault so whatever the cause of her injuries “doesn't matter”?
I'm also the one who added the “boycriedwolf” and “boycryingwolf” keywords that I add to all such false reported claims, regardless of the target. She'll get prosecuted now for her hoax, as she should be.