Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CT-Freeper
"Not that I agree at all with the FEC, but standing is quite an important element of a lawsuit, according to the Rules of Civil Procedure."

So who WOULD have standing? ACORN? NOBODY? If Sarkozy decided he's like to be simultaneously President of France and the US, WHO would "have standing" to challenge that?

You lawyers can't explain anything.

72 posted on 10/23/2008 8:01:34 AM PDT by cookcounty (Sarah and Todd Palin : They're more like us than we are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: cookcounty

They make rules up to fit the situation.

LLS


97 posted on 10/23/2008 8:30:15 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (GOD, Country, Family... except when it comes to dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: cookcounty
So who WOULD have standing?

Clinton.

145 posted on 10/23/2008 9:28:03 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson