Your mistake is in equating the constitution and the principles laid out in the declaration with the geography of this country.
They are not the same.
Perhaps the best way to SAVE the constitution and the declaration is to cut them away from the sickness that threatens to kill it.
The constitution without the land mass of California suffers no degradation. The “life” of the constitution is NOT tied to the geographic make up of the country that adopts it. It is instead tied to the people who share a like mind with those who created it.
Ill try to put it a bit more plainly. Separation from the marxists is NOT giving up the constitution, it would in fact be saving it.
Separation can happen in a couple of ways... The more humane being a peaceful separation, the other being forcefully separating the marxists from this mortal coil. Given the option I would prefer a peaceful separation, but I am NOT afraid of the other method.
that’s where we differ in our solutions, then. Our country’s history already endured a Republic of Texas, and an Alamo (with many legendary heroes), and that republic’s return to the union. No, I’ll stand my ground in Alabama, and hope that my neighbors in other states from the Gulf to the Atlantic to the Pacific up to Canada and down to Mexico will link together in courage and commitment to this country, to this constitution, to these American people.
Our opinions differ on this, but I can appreciate your love of country!