Yes my above statement exposed the author's lack detail and foresight, making his position moot.
The author attempts to smear Kennedy (A combat military veteran) suggesting Kennedy lacked experience, and was perceived by the Soviets as weak. Yet the author omits the fact that Palin, who is one step from the Presidency lacks any direct military experience, and omits the fact that Mulisms, and murdering Mideastern terrorist look upon women and being weak and unworthy of leadership positions.
You can't handle the truth Silverback.
You attack me for stating the truth. This isn't the first time you've done this. lol
Well,, at this point, if Obama and Kennedy were the only choices.... I would pick Kennedy....
You may find trying to slander me as a liar to be a happy good time, but it won't be effective, because anyone who's been around FR awhile can tell that I'm a truthteller.
If your post had not been meant to attack the governor and assert that she is unacceptable because of the views of crazy mullahs, you would not have defended that exact idea to 2ndDivisionVet in post 16. Nor would you have mocked me and Prophet in the wilderness for stating that a woman could be an effective leader in the War on Terror. Certainly, given what I wrote about Meir and the terrorists' likely view of a man in office, you wouldn't have argued against me if your only point was that JFK was not a wuss.
Now, if you want to talk truth, let's talk about it. Please answer these two questions:
1. Do you believe that Sarah Palin is qualified to be VPOTUS?
2. Do you believe she is more or less qualified than Joe Biden or Barack Hussein Obama to be VPOTUS or POTUS?
3. If either of the above answers is "No," is the reason for that answer related to her gender and the perception that 7th Century death cultists have of it? If no, why is she less qualified than a neophyte and a guy who has been wrong on every foreign policy issue for the last 35 years?