[afortiori]

No matter how much I agree with Stephen Moore, I think he's lazy writer and ineffectual debater. On Maher, his argumentation skills are weak at best. And this column is a half-assed rejoinder to a personal pique he felt on the Maher show. What he hasn't done is describe the incontrovertible way Waters attacked regulators of Gin/Fred, and covered for Raines et al.

[HwyChile]

I agree about Stephen Moore not being very good at winning an argument or putting forth winning facts and positions. The left beats him every time I have ever seen him debate.

[PapaBear3625]

No matter how much I agree with Stephen Moore, I think he's lazy writer and ineffectual debater. On Maher, his argumentation skills are weak at best.

If he had been a more effective debater, if at the instant that Maxine had said his charge was a lie he whipped out a screen shot from his pocket which proved she lied on national TV, do you think that he would ever be seen again on Maher's show?. There's a reason why Leftist-run shows like Maher and The View have ineffective debaters on them to represent the conservative side.

Can you imagine Maher or The View having Ann Coulter on?