Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TaxRelief
You cannot compare a 2004 poll to now.

I was replying to a poster who did just that.

It is important to look only at polls that have two non-incumbents running. Those years were 1968, 1988 and 2000, I believe. People, deep down, are afraid of change, so unless the President is utterly incompetent, as Jimmy Carter was, or broke a promise to his base, as Bush senior did, they will, last minute, fall back on avoiding change.

In 1968, in a year of chaos, voters threw out the Democratic candidate, Hubert Humphrey, and opted for change.

In 2000, voters opted for change, despite peace and prosperity.

109 posted on 10/16/2008 9:51:30 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: Alter Kaker
In 1968, 1988 and 2000 voters had to choose between two new candidates, so change was forced upon them, whether they wanted it or not.
110 posted on 10/17/2008 5:26:53 AM PDT by TaxRelief (Walmart: Keeping my family on-budget since 1993.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson