[sam_paine]

The problem is he’s right about Krauthammer. He’s pro embryonic stem cell research

So that makes it ok to act like a DUer and say things about a paraplegiac like "...he wants them to transplant some murdered baby parts in his spine so he'll be able to get an erection again.... I wouldn't just say it to his face, I would happily spit on the reprehensible S.O.B. I'm actually laughing to myself that you would think I would be afraid to say it him?"

You are wrong on merit and substance, but in any case, you really think that's the kind of post we need on FR?

Stem Cell Vindication By Charles Krauthammer: " The verdict is clear: Rarely has a president -- so vilified for a moral stance -- been so thoroughly vindicated. Why? Precisely because he took a moral stance. Precisely because, to borrow Thomson's phrase, Bush was made "a little bit uncomfortable" by the implications of embryonic experimentation."

Disagree with people, fine, but is this really the new norm of discourse for FR?

JimRob, is this how it is now? The AM's have left the post up and not banned the poster, so I guess this is all good in your eyes?

[JewishRighter]

Just hoping to get 7000.

[mass55th]

"You are wrong on merit and substance, but in any case, you really think that's the kind of post we need on FR?"

I'm entitled to my opinion of what I think of another Freeper's post. I wasn't the original poster of the comments you've included in your comment. Your attack on me is way out of line, and I am taking this as a threat and harrassment. Get your facts right buddy.