YES! I hope they can hve all of the ACORN registrations throw out. Every one of them in Ohio should be thrown out no question asked. I was listeneing to the testimony before the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections and it was awful. People beign registered 70+ times etc. Nulify every one of them!
“CLINTON WILL BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT” HOURS ...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22CLINTON+WILL+BE+THE+NEXT+PRESIDENT%22+%22hours+before%22
“CLINTON WILL BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT” HOURS ...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22CLINTON+WILL+BE+THE+NEXT+PRESIDENT%22+%22hours+before%22
Obama says he doesn’t know NUTTIN’ about no acorns. The media will keep repeating it until it is accepted as fact by the public.
I just went to the linked site. Looks like some back peddling is going on now.
Stanley Kurtz on Neil Cavuto’s program presentinbg case against ACORN on FOXNews NOW.
BTTT
Join the StopACORN.org Bloggers Coalition
StopACORN.org | 10/13/2008 | NetRight Nation
Posted on 10/13/2008 12:32:20 PM PDT by NetRight Nation
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2104634/posts
The ACORN Effect: A massive fraud ...
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review | 10-13-2008
Posted on 10/13/2008 12:18:27 AM PDT by My Favorite Headache
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2104305/posts
NEWS RELEASE: “The National Stop Obama Tour” Launches This Week
Our Country Deserves Better Committee | 10/13/2008 | Kelly S. Eustis
Posted on 10/13/2008 10:17:39 AM PDT by Impeach98
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2104510/posts
Talking Politics: Bail Bond Enforcer Prefers McCain’s Take On Gun Rights
The Hartford Courant | October 10, 2008 | VANESSA DE LA TORRE
Posted on 10/12/2008 6:34:44 PM PDT by neverdem
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2104152/posts
RICO?
Excellent!
Major, Tentative Walk-Back: The "US Attorney" part has been deleted from the headline. Not bait and switch; just can't stand by that at the moment.
Damnit. In all likelihood this is not as great as first reported. So yes, I am aware that this is very disappointing. I am disappointed too. I didn't mislead or make a mistake; that was the information I had.
I also can't say for sure the old headline is wrong, but it strongly appears that way at the moment.
I'm really sorry. I can only say again "This is the information I had." Cowbell and flaming skull canceled.
Is that 24 hours, or 24 business hours?
Merry Fitzmas...
I got a fever for more cowbell!
No motor voter, no same day registration and voting, absentee(except military and people actually living out of country)must swear, under penalty of law, that they are really going to be out of their precinct on election day.
Hey lawyer lawyer lawyer....SUE!
Where is the BREAKING NEWS story????
Final Word on "RICO" Suit? BUMP & UPDATE |
I hope. To be posting later on AP. (I hope.) I'd've waited for it to post but I gotta knock off soon. I'll roll the dice that this is accurate.
Not a RICO suit -- a similar but not equivalent suit under Ohio's Corrupt Activity Act, seeking dissolution of ACORN. Figure it has to be ACORN Ohio only.
To be filed Tuesday morning in in the Court of Common Pleas, Warren
County, Ohio
A suit on behalf of citizens asking for, among other things, the
dissolution of ACORN.For violation of the Ohio Corrupt Activity Act
The suit lists 19 predicate acts in Ohio and 40 out-of-state predicate
acts.The suit demands a trial by jury.
Hardly the blockbuster I promised, I know. And the "RICO" thing was wrong as well.
Bear in mind this is a private, third-party suit, probably brought by a conservative organization, or just a few citizens. Not really the imprimatur of the DoJ here.
Not saying it couldn't lead to something. But there's not going to be any big splash about it.
Bump [Gabe]: The complaint, filed by the Buckeye Institute (a think tank), is available here (PDF). If nothing else, it is a useful catalogue of ACORN's most recent misdeeds.
I don't know enough about Ohio's Corrupt Activity Act to say whether they've got a good case, but this gives me pause: Under the Ohio Corrupt Activity Act, the core violations being alleged are forgery, uttering forged documents, tampering with writings and records, and uttering tampered writings or records. I'd have to check the statutes and find the definitions, but Acorn's practice of obtaining multiple registrations from individuals does not, at first blush, appear to be any of these things.
Obtaining voter registrations for Mickey Mouse might fall into one of those categories, but that type of activity isn't listed in the complaint. They seem to focus on the multiple fraudulent registrations instead.
Somebody shoot me some knowledge. Does that sound like forgery or tampering with writings and records to you?
????