Not quite. But I ain’t going to explain it to someone who is about 3 months behind on the story.
What sort of silly assumption is that based on, because one of those links is from a few months back? Wow, such powerful deductive reasoning.
Besides, you're wrong. I've followed every nook and cranny of this "story" from the beginning. I wish it were so, it would be an incredible story. But facts are facts. And the inescapable fact is that if the birth notice in the Hawaii paper is legit then Obama was indeed born in Hawaii as he claims. To believe otherwise is to align oneself with the and 9-11 truthers (like Berg).