Replies

If the e-mails contain exactly that which Corsi claims then it's a different story.

I'm still reading the thread, so maybe this has already been mentioned. Print outs of emails don't consitute evidence, nor would even the hard drive on which the original emails are purported to exist. Corsi would need to have in his hands the actual computer which is purported to have received the emails. That, at least, would substantiate the legitimacy of the actual emails having been received as reported and not tampered with. It would require some sort of computer forensics investigator to authenticate. From there, we'd only have proof that the emails themselves are legitimate, but we'd still lack proof of the sender (although, with enough time and justification, perhaps search warrants could be obtained). There are certainly other people on FR who would know more about this than I do, but this is my understanding based on some passing experiences.

I'm confused by Corsi's story of having emails. I hope he has much more than that, and something(s) that are irrefutable.

“I’m confused by Corsi’s story of having emails. I hope he has much more than that, and something(s) that are irrefutable”

Maybe he downloaded some Kenyan’s computer .PST file??. Not sure if that helps though.

Corsi had U.S. legal reps w/him. Maybe he has stuff on an external hard drive but didn’t say cuz people in Kenya put their lives on the line. An external hard drive would fit under a jacket especially of a staffer on the last day of work packing up their things.

I'm still reading the thread, so maybe this has already been mentioned. Print outs of emails don't consitute evidence, nor would even the hard drive on which the original emails are purported to exist. Corsi would need to have in his hands the actual computer which is purported to have received the emails. That, at least, would substantiate the legitimacy of the actual emails having been received as reported and not tampered with. It would require some sort of computer forensics investigator to authenticate. From there, we'd only have proof that the emails themselves are legitimate, but we'd still lack proof of the sender (although, with enough time and justification, perhaps search warrants could be obtained). There are certainly other people on FR who would know more about this than I do, but this is my understanding based on some passing experiences.

I'm confused by Corsi's story of having emails. I hope he has much more than that, and something(s) that are irrefutable.

Senator Obama was apparently using his Senate email system. If so, the email will be in email archives in the Senate email servers.