Move along......nothing to see here.....
1 posted on
10/05/2008 2:37:51 AM PDT by
SkyPilot
To: SkyPilot
If the glove don’t fit...you must acquit.
One wonders if the boys in prison will be wearing gloves.
2 posted on
10/05/2008 2:39:52 AM PDT by
palomonte
(see the light or feel the heat)
To: SkyPilot
Wonder if he will really confess
3 posted on
10/05/2008 3:00:41 AM PDT by
valkyry1
(McCain/Palin 2008)
To: SkyPilot
Hey OJ, isn’t karma a bee-yotch?
4 posted on
10/05/2008 3:05:56 AM PDT by
libs_kma
(NOBAMA. Keep the change)
To: SkyPilot
In 1995 many African-Americans saw OJ Simpson as an innocent man persecuted because of the colour of his skin. Even though there was plenty of substantive evidence to link him to the 2 murders ...
5 posted on
10/05/2008 3:16:29 AM PDT by
pnh102
(Save America - Ban Ethanol Now!)
To: SkyPilot
Obama’s minions threw OJ under the bus. The only silver lining to this guy’s ascendence.
To: SkyPilot
What (( IF )) O’bama cut him(O.J.) loose?..
8 posted on
10/05/2008 4:01:24 AM PDT by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
To: SkyPilot
I’ll bet you if there was 7-24 media coverage of this trial like last time there would be riots again.
9 posted on
10/05/2008 4:37:02 AM PDT by
Fzob
(In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock. Jefferson)
To: SkyPilot
Good grief. The man just wanted his stuff back.
11 posted on
10/05/2008 4:43:24 AM PDT by
Glenn
(Free Venezuela!)
To: SkyPilot
Like I always say, the Demonrats are the party of the OJ jury. It says it all and is a perfect description.
12 posted on
10/05/2008 5:17:36 AM PDT by
bushfamfan
(Palin is America's Thatcher, Obama is America's Chamberlain)
To: SkyPilot
In 1995 many African-Americans saw OJ Simpson as an innocent man persecuted because of the colour of his skin. I don't believe it. Blacks thought he was just as guilty as whites did. However, the majority of blacks appeared to take more joy in the perception of sticking it to whitey, than in doling out justice.
15 posted on
10/05/2008 6:06:18 AM PDT by
SampleMan
(Community Organizer: What liberals do when they run out of college, before they run out of Marxism.)
To: SkyPilot
If there had been two whites on his original jury, he would not have been acquitted. All the OJ jury did was make people like me aware of the game: most blacks are more more eager for revenge than justice.
17 posted on
10/05/2008 6:11:37 AM PDT by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(The Democratic Party strongly supports full civil rights for necro-Americans.)
To: SkyPilot
I saw the headline and thought the same thing. This was a message to all media outlets to lay off the racial angle or ignore the story.
18 posted on
10/05/2008 6:14:22 AM PDT by
BallyBill
(Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
To: SkyPilot
Were OJ’s children at the trial? I read about his sister being there and caterwauling when he was being carried away. But no mention of his two older children (including the older boy who conspiracy theorists say really killed Ron and Nicole) or his two younger children. Have they all four just moved on? I would like to think Nicole’s children are on friendly terms with the Brown side of the family.
22 posted on
10/05/2008 6:43:08 AM PDT by
Burkean
To: SkyPilot
I'd guess your typical black person doesn't much like kidnappers and armed robbers. Strikes too close to home. Kill a couple of whiteys though and it's apparently a different story.
To: SkyPilot
If you lose you stuff an throw a fit,
there is no way we will acquit.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson