Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: af_vet_rr

Yea,, whatever.
You forget don’t you?
It wasn’t until Hillary started with Wright and Ayers that she started winning. She needed to start sooner.


385 posted on 10/04/2008 4:17:10 PM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies ]


To: snarkytart
You forget don’t you?

It wasn’t until Hillary started with Wright and Ayers that she started winning. She needed to start sooner.


There was more than enough time for the Wright and Ayers stuff to take hold, especially for the Wright stuff. More than enough time and more than enough coverage among all of the media outlets. For a while you couldn't watch any news coverage because it was nothing but Obama's preacher being shown everywhere, and Hillary pushed the terrorism stuff in the most-watched primary debate.

I said it already, those who care about terrorism are voting McCain already, and if the undecideds and independents cared about terrorism, McCain would be facing Hillary instead of Osama. Emulating Hillary at this point is just wasting time and energy and is not drawing in these voters - they stopped caring about terrorism years ago.

We already lost Congress in 2006 thanks to the independents and undecideds (they helped Bush in 2000, but he and the GOP started losing them in 2004).

McCain has something that Hillary didn't have - a lot of economic problems weighing on peoples' minds, and if he wastes that opportunity, we are going to be watching Obama being sworn in next year. His campaign has been leaving Palin out of the loop or treating her as an after-thought, when she could be an incredibly valuable tool.
435 posted on 10/04/2008 8:59:53 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson