Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brytani
Dr. Lee wanted to expose the LAPD procedures in an attempt to change them.

He picked the wrong fricken case to play god.

Two people were murdered.

That logic is akin to me saying I blew up the Pentagon in an attempt to expose lax security.

Shame on him.

805 posted on 10/04/2008 10:36:42 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 800 | View Replies ]


To: SkyPilot

You won’t do this as most people won’t but go back and actually read his testimony.

On most of the defenses claims he argued with the defense, on factual matters concerning incredibly bad standards for evidence collection and lab procedures, was he supposed to perjure himself?

I flat out told him I would not have taken the case for any amount of money and he brought up two points with me.

1. Hindsight is 20/20, he didn’t think any jury would find him innocent just that there was probable cause on the issue raised above.
2. He testified truthfully which is the obligation of any expert witness in any case and can get you thrown in jail if you do not. His testimony on way too many key points validated what Dr. Badin said to the point the defense was so furious with him threats were made, Lee wouldn’t say more on that point.

Being in the “bizz” myself, I can see both sides of the issue. I also know the LAPD’s procedures at the time were not up to the the most basic set of standards.

While you won’t believe this either, in the end Dr. Lee didn’t get OJ off, it was the jury. A jury that if shown a tape of OJ practically decapitating Nicole would still have found the scumbag innocent.


808 posted on 10/04/2008 10:59:29 AM PDT by Brytani (http://rantsofaconservativelady.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 805 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson