Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texas_shutterbug

I think his campaign was a lot better when he ran against Hillary. I don’t see large crowds for Obama now, like he had when she was his rival. I see a bunch of videos on YouTube showing many moments where he has trouble enunciating words - with or without a teleprompter. A lot of his handlers are from the Carter days. Bill and Hillary are dissing him indirectly every time they can. I’ll grant that he’s avoiding any and all blame for the Fannie/Freddie fiasco - and that’s impressive. But the media is behind him, and his campaign gets no real scrutiny. What am I missing that makes his campaign “great?”


17 posted on 10/03/2008 12:35:06 PM PDT by floozy22 (Hey, can I call you Joe?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: floozy22
His involvement in the economic fiasco is no better and no worse than most of the other politicians. I'm one of those who believes they're all guilty, but then I believe in reasonable regulation, so I blame republicans, as well.

For what it's worth (yes, she's a liberal), but I happen to think there's a lot of truth to this article.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/outlook/6037097.html The Houston Chronicle is my home paper, by the way, but I take it for the ads! LOL

18 posted on 10/03/2008 12:53:12 PM PDT by Texas_shutterbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson