Well, the left doesn't operate that way - they are in this to win as big as they can possibly manage.
I can't imagine why McCain wouldn't have seen it coming. I guess too many parties in the Senate cloak room with uncle Teddy has clouded his perspective.
That’s exactly what the feeling I have is Skeeter. First, what in the hell was that statement he made about Teddy in his opening debate remark?! Who’s he trying to please? A liberal? I do admire a lot of what McCain has done to reach across the aisle, but he’s left his seat entirely, he sitting in the middle of the aisle and the right is pissed, I don’t blame them one bit. This Ifill deal is huge, they have to pull out of the debate IMO, reschedule it or something, Palin needs a fair platform to either sink or swim. Not fair what she’ll face tonight.
Since you mentioned his name...
I'm hoping that some of this hyper-partisanship goes away with the passing of Kennedy.
If I recall correctly, it was Kennedy who first thought up the strategy of filibustering judicial appointments.
I think Kennedy was a strong factor in flipping Jim Jeffords (Kennedy regained control of the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, moving Jeffords to another committee -- health care being Kenned's passion), which threw the Senate into chaos and forced a power-sharing arrangement.
I remember back in 2001 watching the late-night debate over power-sharing, especially with the Senate Intelligence Committee and Democrat demands to have their own staff and budget for the first time. I remember Hatch making speeches, Kennedy making speeches, Daschle making speeches.
I just have this feeling that Ted Kennedy was a catalyst for much of the Democrat hardball that emerged in the late 1990s until now, and I hope some of that passes with Kennedy.
-PJ