To: pabianice
I don't disagree with the toe sucker on this one. McCain's position on the bailout is incomprehensible. It only makes sense if you're fixated on "bipartisanship" above all else.
Morris' take was that McCain should embrace the ideas of the Republicans who voted against the bill, and draw a clear distinction between his position and Obama's.
If Palin has to go forth in the debate and try to explain McCain's position on this bill, she's going to get slaughtered. It's time for McCain to start doing some of that OODA voodoo that he was so masterful with after the convention.
To: Question Liberal Authority
I hate to say it but McCain has let this campaign slip through his fingers. He has let Palin out there swinging in the wind with only an occasional cursory defense by him against the vicious attack on her by the left. Now I hear that his staff is over-prepping her for Thursday’s debate. Unless some miracle occurs we might as well take down the yard signs and call it a day, the parties over. Thanks to the McCain staff of imcompetents.
66 posted on
09/30/2008 1:50:00 PM PDT by
Russ
(Repeal the 17th amendment)
To: Question Liberal Authority
McCain's position on the bailout is incomprehensible. It only makes sense if you're fixated on "bipartisanship" above all else.
It's a disease. Like liberalism itself. A form of brain cancer. And even a great hero like McCain, once smitten with it, is turned into a drooling fool.
To: Question Liberal Authority
If Palin has to go forth in the debate and try to explain McCain's position on this bill, she's going to get slaughtered.This concerns me too. McCain needs to come up with a better defined strategy to deal with the bailout issue, or Biden will use this as a club to pummel Palin with.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson