Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hinckley buzzard
As a hard core Marxist he will simply gut the elections of any meaning.

How do you think he'd do that? My guess would be giving lots of power to bureaucrats. Keep the Pres/Congress elections in place but create a super powerful bureaucracy, a fourth branch of the government w/o checks or balances.
51 posted on 09/27/2008 8:15:09 AM PDT by itsPatAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: itsPatAmerican
Good guess. Imagine a "National Elections Board" established for the Public Good, to screen and approve candidates. We certainly don't want people to be misled by dishonest and subversive anti-social elements running rogue candidates do we. The Board, of course, will be composed of handpicked operatives. We could vote for anyone we wanted as long as s/he was an "approved" option. Like when Henry Ford said "People can have a Model T in any color they want, so long as it is black."
57 posted on 09/27/2008 8:32:50 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: itsPatAmerican

“How do you think he’d do that?”

By funneling money to Acorn and putting them and theirs in charge of monitoring elections.

they are so transparent- they already had the audacity to earmark BILLIONS for Acorn in Paulsen’s bailout proposal.

It doesnt even require thinking too far outside the box.


65 posted on 09/27/2008 10:34:36 AM PDT by Canedawg (Show me an old liberal and I'll show you a man without a brain. -Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson