To: MartinaMisc
2 posted on
09/26/2008 5:12:41 PM PDT by
kingattax
(99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
To: kingattax
it would not even be a race without Palin.
4 posted on
09/26/2008 5:14:04 PM PDT by
scooby321
(Cai)
To: kingattax
Wow..talk about lowering expectations, what next “Sarah Palin or lump of coal”?
IMO, those in punditry land are taking heat for not joining the chorus, they have not even given Governor Palin a chance to speak on a national stage in a debate and they already are throwing dirt on her?
Shame on those people, and K Parker is a no name, yet those pundits speak more highly of her then they do Governor Palin, trying to make a name for the lady on Governor Palin’s reputation is unseemly.
18 posted on
09/26/2008 5:19:57 PM PDT by
padre35
(Sarah Palin is the one we've been waiting for..Rom 10.10..)
To: kingattax
They’ll change their tune after Sarah demolishes Plugs in their debate. But we won’t be accepting any apologies!
32 posted on
09/26/2008 5:27:20 PM PDT by
soupcon
To: kingattax
We won't be discussing this if John Mc had put away Obama in the debate as he had many opportunities to do. Instead he chose to run against Bush and Wall Street; never once mentioned the democRATS who invested ( like inhabited) Fannie Ma & Freddie Mac. Never once mentioned the B. Franks, Dodd, Gorelick, RAines, Johnson incompetence. Never once mentioned the connection between Renzo, ACORN and threat of race/poverty pimping that went on in providing Federal guananteed monies to the “community”.
104 posted on
09/28/2008 11:57:27 AM PDT by
BilLies
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson