To: eyedigress
I'm calling BS on Luntz's pool of "undecideds". Either they duped him or he is slanting intentionally. He keeps showing tape of the same three people (two older women and an older man), who are making comments right out of the DNC playbook. They are not saying off-the-cuff things a political neophyte or truly objective person would say. And why keep highlighting those same three, when supposedly the majority there loved Obama in the debate?
Luntz claimed he took great pains to find true undecideds, but then admits it was done by asking them who they voted for in 2004 and got an even split. How does he know they didn't tell him what he needed to hear to get on the panel?
BS BS BS. No way those three Luntz kept highlighting went into it not already pro-Obama and anti-Mccain. Not buying it for a second.
I will say best thing about the focus group was the young guy who was a dead ringer for Cowboys QB Tony Romo!
To: over3Owithabrain
I am as well. There is s msn in Pennsylvania saying in his traditionally Dem area tonight I thought McCain won hands down.
To: over3Owithabrain
He lost alot of credibility with this group. Reading this Hannity?
To: over3Owithabrain
I am as well. There is a man (talking with Greta) in Pennsylvania saying in his traditionally Dem area tonight, “They thought McCain won hands down. “
To: over3Owithabrain
No way LUNTZ can be this naive.
LUNTZ KNOWS THAT HE KNOWS THESE ARE OBAMA PLANTS.
What are their names? Was the Obama team detailed enough to make sure these obvious Obama PLANTS didn't leave their Dem voting and campaign donations untraceable?![](http://www.thegrillstoreandmore.com/image/products/big-pics/462432b.jpg)
Obama plants...ya never know where they'll surface.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson