Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TonyInOhio
Could it be that debates and daily tracking polls aren't quite as important as conventional wisdom assumes?

Take a look at RealClear Politics from 2004, although in all fairness those were LV polls, something we don't seem to get in this election cycle. Bush was clearly ahead in those polls as early as the beginning of September 2004. McCain has not shown the same tendency in the 2008 polls.

63 posted on 09/24/2008 7:28:08 AM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: CatOwner
Bush was clearly ahead in those polls as early as the beginning of September 2004. McCain has not shown the same tendency in the 2008 polls.

That's true, but I'm certain that those polls did not weight so heavily in Kerry's favor as the pollsters are in Obama's favor this year.

I did some quick checking on the exit polling from the 2006 election, a terrible year for Republicans. The turnout difference between the parties favored Democrats by 3%, 38% to 35%. Three points. Going back over the past five Presidential elections, the greatest spread in party ID was 4%.

I think it's possible that McCain is behind or that he has a slight lead, but that's impossible to determine from current polling. Any poll that gives the Democrats more than a 4% advantage in party ID is questionable, even Rasmussen, even Gallup, and especially the ABC/WaPo junk that came out last night.

82 posted on 09/24/2008 8:06:47 AM PDT by TonyInOhio (This is no time to go wobbly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson