Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HamiltonJay
Sorry I don't see the humor in it.

Surely they could have found another subject to "joke" about other than jokingly implying that Todd Palin is having incestuous pedophile sex with his minor daughters.

What if they would have jokingly implied that it was Obama who was having incestuous pedophile sex with his two minor daughters? Of course they would never do that to the Messiah, so why did they think they could jokingly imply that Todd Palin was?
46 posted on 09/22/2008 10:33:30 AM PDT by stlnative (HurraMcCain Palin will continue to build strength as it travels across the USA over the next 60 days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: stlnative

The skit did not IMPLY that, in fact it IMPLIED the exact OPPOSITE, but the NYT would print it anyway!!! And that was the whole point of the skit, for pete’s sake, SNL finally takes an honest shot at the MSM and people are too stupid or willingly ignorant to notice, but just knee jerk because some talk radio pinhead who doesn’t know what he’s talking about decided to scream about it.

The entire piece was ripping how the media was willing to publish ANYTHING to attack the Palin’s no matter how ludicrous or how lacking in any supporting facts. That’s what the skit was.

There was nothing over the top about the skit, the only thing over the top, is the level of ignorance one has to engage in, willing, or biologically influence to believe this skit was an attack on the Palin family in any way shape or form.


77 posted on 09/22/2008 11:08:01 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson