To: Sub-Driver
Oh for goodness sakes, the skit was meant to point out what a bunch of butt clowns the NYT is for taking gaarbage spewed directly from the Daily Kos and DU and posting it as fact.
Kind of like those butt clowns from Hollywood do. E.G. ~ Matt Damon, Lindsay Lohan, Chevy chase. Clueless.
10 posted on
09/22/2008 10:07:19 AM PDT by
Tempest
(The devil and the media have sided with Obama)
To: Tempest
Oh for goodness sakes, the skit was meant to point out what a bunch of butt clowns the NYT is for taking gaarbage spewed directly from the Daily Kos and DU and posting it as fact. I didn't see the skit, but where's the balance? Why wouldn't they make a skit that shows Obama's family as a bunch of Islamic, bomb-making terrorists?
51 posted on
09/22/2008 10:36:45 AM PDT by
Lou L
To: Tempest
Yeah, it was obviously mocking the liberal, out of touch elitists on the NY Times, yet some people think it put down the Palins...I just don’t get it sometimes!
Ed
56 posted on
09/22/2008 10:44:32 AM PDT by
Sir_Ed
To: Tempest
Well, if you think the skit is just a satire on the liberal media, let's redo the damn skit next week with OBAMA as the focus. As in, "Gee, he must be doing his daughters. You know how it is among THOSE families."
See? That sounds mighty offensive to me.
Remember, the audience was tittering away at the idea of those rubes in Alaska doing their daughters. That poor white trash up North - always good for a cheap laugh among the young hip NYC audience.
69 posted on
09/22/2008 10:58:42 AM PDT by
Ciexyz
To: Tempest
100 posted on
09/22/2008 11:35:42 AM PDT by
Checkers
(Voting for McCain? Then don't complain. (Hey, that rhymes.))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson