Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CodeToad
Well....I learned something.

I've generally thought any form of naked shorting was illegal.

Am I out in left field...in my belief that naked shorting generally only happens on foreign exchanges? And in OTC type stocks?

55 posted on 09/18/2008 8:21:15 AM PDT by Osage Orange (We are the ones we've been waiting for. We are the change that we seek. - Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Osage Orange

“Am I out in left field...in my belief that naked shorting generally only happens on foreign exchanges? And in OTC type stocks?

Hard to say, but I suspect that few would naked short a Blue Chip as they typically don’t offer much gain in a short. If they did, I suspect they would be naked shorted, and I believe that is the only reason for the SEC announcement on naked shorts as we are watching Fortune 1000 stocks take a dive.


63 posted on 09/18/2008 8:46:39 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: Osage Orange

See Post #75.

Codetoad is parroting an SEC hack that was propagandizing from 2006 when they thought they could pull it over on the public.

Naked shorting of any form IS ILLEGAL.

Because naked shorting is the act of selling short with the knowledge that the shares sold do not in fact exist. ‘With the knowledge’ goes to motive and intent.

A market maker must have a high, very high expectation that the shares can be located and must deliver in a tight window. this is not the same as naked shorting which is undefined in the SEC regulations. See the link in Post #75.


76 posted on 09/18/2008 10:59:26 PM PDT by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson