BTW, Palin said last night that she and McCain have an agreement... that she will NOT rubber stamp his agenda... and she says he is coming around on ANWAR and other things. Sarah will not allow him to appoint anything BUT Pro Life Justices... or she will go public against him... and he has agreed to her autonomy. These are mavericks not just campaign slogans. I cannot wait for them to clean up the the sewage in DC!
LLS
“McCain and Palin will be Pro Life 100%... no doubt... each has a professional record of being pro life and both have done things in private that prove it. I cannot believe that you even wasted time asking.”
I didn’t ask. My previous response to another poster describes why a vote for McCain is not a pro-life vote.
I watched the Sarah Palin interview with Charlie Gibson and was 99.9% underwhelmed by what I heard from her. I expected her to say that she was pro-life and believed that government had a role to play in protecting the unborn. Instead she talked about a very nebulous “culture of life”, adoption and (implied) government support for mothers. She completely side-stepped any discussion of pro-life legislation, of enforcement, of judges, of state vs. federal jurisdiction & responsibilities etc. She also stated that she believes in the “health & life of the mother” exception - something which most of the pro-life community is opposed to, and which could likely be used to justify the majority of abortions.
“BTW, Palin said last night that she and McCain have an agreement”
Is this agreement verbal or written? By “pro-life justices” does she mean judges who would support personhood for the preborn? If McCain is truly pro-life, why is it that she needs to keep him from appointing pro-abortion justices???????